Reign of Christ: 23 November 2025

Though Harper Lee was born and raised in Monroeville, Alabama, and I was born and raised in the Tidewater area of Virginia, we were most certainly distant cousins, as we shared descent from the Lee family of Virginia, enslavers, patriots, and traitors, though only she got the name, my descent being matrilineal. 

I knew none of this when I was assigned to read “To Kill A Mockingbird” in high school, a shocking assignment actually, given the hold the “Lost Cause” myth of the Confederacy had on Virginia curriculums all those decades ago. But there it was, this instant classic published just a couple of years before I was born, a book that was anti-racist and woke before those words meant what those words have come to mean.

“Mockingbird” is the rare “bildungsroman,” or “coming of age” tale, written from the perspective of a female character. Scout Finch, her older brother Jem, and neighboring summer-visitor Dill, watch events unfold as her attorney father, Atticus, is assigned to defend Tom Robinson, a Black man falsely accused of raping a white woman. It is a trope all too common among white supremacists, imagining men and women of the African diaspora as bestial, impulsive, and hyper-sexual, a trope that watered the deep roots of the lynching tree.

I’d later learn that the character Dill was inspired by real life seasonal neighbor Truman Capote. I’d learn that the future authors maintained close ties well into adulthood, with Lee accompanying Capote to Kansas to research “In Cold Blood” while “Mockingbird” was in production. The relationship withered and died when “Mockingbird” became a Pulitzer Prize-winning success, though the perpetually petty Capote was himself already wildly successful. 

I watched in dismay as an earlier draft of “Mockingbird” was controversially released as “Go Set a Watchman” in 2015, just months before Lee died at the age of 89. Everything about that affair was tawdry and tainted and undoubtedly exploitative.

I will not describe much of the novel’s plot. Many folks have read the book, while many others have seen the 1962 Academy Award-winning film starring Gregory Peck, that year’s Best Actor. If you have done neither, I urge you to do so. It is sadly relevant to the time in which we live.

Continue reading “Reign of Christ: 23 November 2025”

Tangled: 16 November 2025

Isaiah 65:17-25

Most of you know I care about available, affordable, and accessible housing. It is a primary focus of my other job. I have this crazy idea that an able-bodied person of working age who has a full-time job should be able to afford a roof over their head. Crazy, right? Next thing you know, I’ll go all Zohran Mamdani on the good people of Elmira, and suggest something totally Communist like affordable childcare, or lifesaving healthcare that doesn’t force people into bankruptcy.

Given that, you would think I’d love today’s reading from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah. After all, what isn’t to love about people enjoying the fruit of their own work, literally in the case of vineyards, figuratively when it comes to living in the house you built. And that would be the easy way out for a sleep-deprived pastor with a new puppy in the house. Deliver some Sunday morning fluff, and let everyone head to coffee hour.

There is only problem with that plan. That problem is me.

Because there is another story, one that is important. One that involves context. 

There are three distinct historic periods represented in the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, maybe better titled the Book of the Isaiah School of Prophecy. The earliest, a slight majority of the book, likely comes from the time of the original prophet, Isaiah bin Amoz, which is to say Isaiah the son of Amoz, because surnames were not a thing. You were known by your tribe, village, and father.

Continue reading “Tangled: 16 November 2025”

Defeat of Bogey: 9 November 2025

Luke 20:27-38

In our century, G.K. Chesterton, is best known by the PBS crowd as the English author of the Father Brown mysteries, a series of stories he admittedly churned out quickly for pay. There were fifty stories published during his lifetime, with three more discovered after his death in 1936. There have been many adaptations of the series for film, radio, and television, with the most recent BBC television series airing its 130th episode in March of this year. 

I can only assume that fifty stand-alone stories producing that many television episodes is down to a miracle akin to Jesus multiplying the loaves and the fishes, or maybe some serious theological mathematics. After all, Christian theologians routinely turn one into three.

During his lifetime, Chesterton was practically a one-man publishing house, producing eighty books, more than a hundred and fifty short stories outside of the Father Brown series, and thousands of essays. He was a public intellectual, and on the side of the angels in opposing imperialism and eugenics, as well as supporting an economic model that landed justly between capitalism and communism. In our time, it is especially notable that he was an early and vocal critic of Hitler.

A convert to the Roman communion, some have even suggested that Chesterton be named a saint in that tradition. He does not quite make my list.

In a 1909 essay, he wrote:

Fairy tales do not give a child his first idea of bogey. What fairy tales give the child is his first clear idea of the possible defeat of bogey. The baby has known the dragon intimately ever since he had an imagination. What the fairy tale provides for him is a St. George to kill the dragon.

Dragons have been around a long time. John of Patmos describes Satan as a dragon in the apocalypse that concludes the Christian canon. Shakespeare mentions them in “Richard III” and “King Lear.” They appear in countless fantasy series written for children and adults, from J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Hobbit” to Cressida Cowell’s “How to Train Your Dragon” series. Films have been made of all of these works.

I personally love the meme, found on t-shirts and bumper stickers, that advises against meddling in the affairs of dragons, reminding us that “you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.”

Chesterton conflates the bogey and the dragon, both representing our fears, chaos and the unknown, the darkness that has a shape in the imagination of a child, particularly terrifying in recent decades in the writing of Stephen King, Pennywise in the storm drain. But most humans outgrow the bogey of darkness, and grow into the bogey of death, the ultimate unknown, for the monster in the dark is the deathbringer.

Continue reading “Defeat of Bogey: 9 November 2025”

Monsters of Love: 2 November 2025

Luke 6:20-31

You already know the Birkat Kohanim, the Priestly Benediction of Judaism, though you likely do not know it by that name. It is:

May the Lord bless you, and keep you;
May the Lord make His face shine upon you, and be gracious to you;
May the Lord lift up His face to you, and give you peace.

The text is found in the Book of Numbers in the Torah, and if a Kohanim is present for synagogue worship, he delivers the blessing, just as he has precedence in delivering the “aliyah,” or first reading from the Torah. This special Jewish caste, the Kohanim, is recognized to this day and claims patrilineal descent from the Ancient Israelite priesthood. Specifically, the Kohanim claim descent from Aaron, brother of Moses. Because this caste is based on patrilineal descent, Kohanim generally have one of five last names, the most common being Cohen.

Trekkies routinely use a version of the hand-gesture associated with the blessing, adapted by Leonard Nimoy as the Vulcan salute. Millions of people received the full Birkat Kohanim blessing from Eliezer ben Nisan ha’Cohen. He delivered it at the end of his concerts, the singer-songwriter performing under his common name, Leonard Cohen.

Some of you may know that Leonard Cohen spent years studying Zen Buddhism, and was ordained as a monk of the Rinzai School in 1996. He was also quite fond of Jesus. But he remained faithfully Jewish his entire life, and when he died in 2016, he was laid to rest in a simple pine box in the Jewish cemetery of his hometown in Quebec.

So what does a priestly-Jewish Zen Buddhist Jesus-fanboy have to tell a bunch of semi-Protestant heterodox religious refugees about sainthood? 

Continue reading “Monsters of Love: 2 November 2025”

Yaky? Sh?nen: 26 October 2025

2 Timothy 4:6-8, 16-18

Sermon:

Shohei Ohtani was already considered by some to be the greatest baseball player who has ever lived. He is certainly the greatest player since George Herman Ruth, aka Babe Ruth, pitched and slugged his way into the history books. Take, as an example, a game nine days ago, in the National League Championship series between Ohtani’s team, the Los Angeles Dodgers, and the Milwaukee Brewers. Ohtani pitched six innings, with ten strike outs, two hits, and no runs. He did okay in the batter’s box too. To be precise, he hit three home runs in three at bats, one clearing the awning over the bleachers in the center field of Dodger Stadium. The Japanese call boys who are completely focused on baseball Yaky? Sh?nen. I think at this point, Ohtani is well beyond “baseball boy.” The word legend comes to mind.

Some athletes change their entire sport, among them, Michael Jordan in basketball and Kelly Slater in surfing. Some, and Ohtani seems to be among them, are unicorns, one-offs who defy all the norms of their sport or, you know, physics and physiology.

Elbie Fletcher was a unicorn of sorts in his day too, or at least the fastest little pony in the unicorn pen. The Boston Braves held a contest in 1934 to identify the local high school baseball player most likely to make it to the Major Leagues. Fletcher won the contest, attended training camp, and actually made the team. He went on to play for twelve seasons, was a decent if unremarkable hitter, and had a remarkable .993 fielding percentage at first base.

His first year in the Major Leagues also happened to be the last year Babe Ruth played. The Great Bambino was back in Boston after fourteen seasons with the Yankees. Fletcher would describe the experience:

“He still had that marvelous swing, and what a follow-through, just beautiful, like a great golfer. But he was forty years old. He couldn’t run, he could hardly bend down for a ball, and of course he couldn’t hit the way he used to. One of the saddest things of all is when an athlete begins to lose it … and to see it happening to Babe Ruth, to see Babe Ruth struggling on a ball field, well, then you realize we’re all mortal and nothing lasts forever.”

Shohei Ohtani may have an amazing and long career, like his compatriot Ichiro Suzuki, or the “Iron Man,” Cal Ripken Jr. But in the end, he, like Babe Ruth, will prove to be mortal. Like me. Like you.

In today’s reading from the text traditionally called Paul’s Second Letter to Timothy, the apostle is facing his own mortality. 

Now, to do our wonkish “taking scripture seriously enough to study it” thing, I must inform you that Second Timothy is probably not an authentic Pauline text, at least not in the form we have received. It was common in those days to produce pseudepigraphic works, a fancy way of saying texts that use false authorship to establish their authority. The gospels attributed to Matthew and John most certainly fall into this category, as do all of the short letters known as the Pastoral Epistles. 

Second Timothy is especially problematic for thinking Christians, for the selective literalists who call themselves “Fundamentalist” base their heresy on one sentence, labeled Chapter 3, Verse 16-17 in our current numbering system. It reads:

“Every scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for showing mistakes, for correcting, and for training character, so that the person who belongs to God can be equipped to do everything that is good.”

If the passage was authentic and authoritative, it could not refer to the Christian Testament, which did not exist in Paul’s lifetime. And of course, selective literalists ignore passages they find inconvenient, passages that prohibit cheeseburgers and demand economic justice.

Scripture tells us that that the Jewish Council in Jerusalem sought Paul’s death, that he was arrested and held by the Roman governor at their insistence, and that Paul appealed to the Emperor by right of his Roman citizenship. 

The Acts of the Apostles recounts his journey to Rome in the custody of imperial officials, tells us of a spectacular shipwreck and time spent on Malta. That text ends by telling us that the Roman Jews were divided over what to do about Paul, and he remained under house arrest for two years. No mention is made of a Roman trial and execution. Legend claims he was a martyr, and some scholars believe he was dead by 60 C.E. We do know Nero blamed the Great Fire of Rome in 64 C.E. on Christians, leading to a spasm of persecution.

In Second Timothy, Paul says “As for me, I am already being poured out as a libation, and the time of my departure has come. I have fought the good fight; I have finished the race; I have kept the faith.” 

This feels wrong to me, for throughout most authentic texts, Paul seems confident in his message and in his eventual acquittal. But operating in the world of this text, Paul is saying goodbye to Timothy, his frequent co-worker in the mission field. He is going out with grace.

We don’t all have that opportunity. Infirmity and disaster may strip us of our dignity in our final moments. 

I get asked about death a lot as a pastor, have journeyed with individuals and families through the final months and days, sometimes through the final minutes and hours. Only one time have I offered easy answers, answers I did not actually believe. 

It was my very first deathbed, during my second year at Divinity School, while on call at the Boston hospital where I was completing my clinical training. I was half asleep when I arrived in the ICU, the family mostly cried out, the dim lights making everything blue, including the patient in his last moments.

I grabbed a Bible, read the family First Thessalonians 4, the text used in most funerals and memorial services, our deceased flying up in the air to meet Christ at the Second Coming. 

Paul’s First Letter to the Church at Thessaloniki is likely the earliest extant text from the Christian era, written around the year 52 C.E., and is accepted as authentic. I was analyzing that very same passage as a seminar assignment for the world’s foremost Pauline scholar. I knew it was the coward’s way out, scripture out of context to support the folk tales we have constructed as our religion. I swore that in the future, I would be compassionate but honest, that I would not fear death, but would live in the present tense and, sometimes, the tense present.

What comes next? I don’t know. 

I know that the Pharisees developed a theology of life after death a couple of centuries before Jesus because the old transactional theology simply didn’t work. Bad people sometimes thrived, good people sometimes suffered, so maybe our reward happened in another life. That doesn’t mean its not true. It doesn’t mean it is. 

Some of the texts we translate to mean life after death actually say life in full. But Jesus is recorded as teaching his followers about life with God after life here on earth. 

I guess I’ll find out. Or won’t. But I’m not going to waste the days that I have obsessing over it.

I believed in practical Christianity long before I came to The Park Church. Our biological purpose and our spiritual purpose are not so far apart when you zoom out and consider us as a species. Justice and love and humility are how we contribute to the thriving of us, the child having seizures by the fire, the man who was mugged… wounded in the ditch, the widow who is down to her last containers of flour and oil.

In our imagination and creativity, we align ourselves with the mystery, the power that we call God. Our purpose is not to stroke the ego of a domestic abuser in the sky. Our purpose is to be useful and to create. And if there is a heaven of some sort, or karma and reincarnation, that should check the boxes.

Though, for the record, if there is reincarnation, I’m aiming to come back as a Golden Retriever, because who wouldn’t want that kind of joy?

There is a degree of randomness in the system, a requirement for life, so not every life can be measured by usefulness and creativity. Some people are broken, unable to love, and so they break others in turn. 

Our definition of thriving has required some significant adjustment in recent years, as we recognize that our relentless energy and toxic humans with diseased spirits have put life itself, human life and the life of the planet, at risk. We’ve had to realize that not only is the victim in the ditch our sibling, not only is the Samaritan that comes to his aid, but so too is the fox running through the field, the one lost sheep and the shepherd who is searching.

We hope to die well, but first we must live well. We tell the stories of extraordinary people, of Babe Ruth and Annis Ford Eastman and Harvey Milk, and of ordinary people, the people who are part of our personal story, those with pictures on our ofrenda, and those we hold in our hearts.

And then we do the thing. We roll up our sleeves, knead the dough, paint the porch, send an email to a cousin we haven’t connected with in awhile, wash soup kitchen dishes, and once in a while, hit a spiritual home run that sails completely out of the park. Amen.

PRAYERS OF THE PEOPLE concluding with the Lord’s Prayer

Let us pray.

Most Divine Mystery we name as God,
we pray for those caught up by the noise in the system,
the chaos and complexity that makes room for new life,
for our own clinging and fear of the unknown,
for all who fail to live fully.

We pray for those whose lives are cut short
by the insanity of war
or the every day violence
of active shooters and private equity.

We pray for protesters in frog suits in Portland
and disrupters in Chicago.

We pray for the sin sick souls
that are firing hundreds of thousands of workers,
breaking our promises of asylum,
tearing down the wrong walls,
and looting our common wealth.

Jesus lived under cruelty and corruption,
that of Rome and that of religion, 
so we pray in resistance as he taught us, saying:

Our Father…

Listening to the Holy: 19 October 2025

Jeremiah 31:27-34

Sermon: Listening

Last week’s ceasefire and exchange of hostages and prisoners in Gaza and Israel has been characterized by some as a “peace deal.” It is no such thing. 

The war criminals of Hamas, the Netanyahu government, and the Israeli Defense Force do not stand in the dock to be tried for their crimes against humanity, and all three parties are guilty. We have all been witness to those crimes, broadcast by what little is left of our free press. 

There has been no change in the position of the Israeli and American governments on the West Bank, where ethnic cleansing continues unabated. 

No one has offered a solution to the problem that multiple ethnic groups with violent hatred for one another claim the exact same land, that some Jews do not trust their safety to others or multi-ethnic states for legitimate reasons, that even the most progressive-minded peace advocates offer only solutions that leave two competing ethno-states in place, a moral outrage in the Twenty-First Century. Any ethno-state, defined by race or religion, is repugnant in a scientific age that understands human migration, genetics, and the absolute meaninglessness of our claims of “us versus them.”

Rather than peace, we have a suspension of the most visible violence for some unknown period of time. But make no mistake, there is still violence, systemic and direct. 

Many of us have been thinking about the Nuremberg Trials recently, not just when it comes to the Gaza War, but also as we consider the complicity of so many corporations in the crimes of our own current government, for a handful of German industrialists were tried after the Second World War as an example to others, in the dock beside the political and military leaders of the Third Reich. 

What is most certainly worthy of our consideration today is the war crime of collective punishment. It is codified in Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and while Israel claims the massive death toll in Gaza is simply “acceptable” collateral damage, there is little question in the eyes of the world that this is a genocide, the collective punishment of all Gazans for the horrific crimes of Hamas.

I am sure I am not the only one in this Sanctuary who was infuriated by collective punishment as a teenager, the age when many of us were beginning to solidify our framework for justice. A few bad actors, and boom… the class ski trip is cancelled, or the prom. 

In my personal pantheon of high school evil, the moral outrage of youth, collective punishment is right up there with group projects, which says something about my suburban privilege and age. I came of age before active shooters were a thing, before kids were watching the world burn, literally, around them.

Continue reading “Listening to the Holy: 19 October 2025”

Two Homily Sunday: Anniversary Service

Service of the Word

10:00am 12 October 2025

Luke 17:11-19

SERMON Present Moment

If you heard me describe the absence of interfaith awareness in my childhood, you might think I grew up in Frog Holler, Alabama or some such place. 

In fact, I grew up in the Tidewater area of Virginia, and while not exactly multi-cultural Chicago, it was a populated and diverse metro, even back in the era before the globalized Neo-liberal economy. 

We were far from Native American populations and the rich cultural mix of the border regions, but the huge military presence brought people to Norfolk and Virginia Beach. I knew where there was a Jewish congregation, was part of a Boy Scout troop sponsored by a Catholic Church, marveled at the Chinese newspapers of the longtime immigrant who bought the house behind us, but knew nothing about those other religions. The closest I came to a multicultural experience was the religions and cultures of Middle Earth, for like any little nerdy boy of my era, I was into all things Tolkien, and before long, all things Dungeons and Dragons.

It would only be as an adult that I would learn about variations in Christianity, and eventually non-Christian religions. The first that really caught my attention was Buddhism. A friend encouraged me to read “Seven Years in Tibet” by Heinrich Harrer, opening the door to Tibetan Buddhism and the cause of the Tibetan people: the nation swallowed by Communist China, the culture slowly erased by Han Chinese. While Harrer’s story turned out to be problematic, and by problematic I mean Nazi, I went on to learn about other forms of Buddhism, at the moment Zen and Japanese culture became a fad in business thinking. 

One of the first books on Buddhist practice that I read was “The Miracle of Mindfulness” by Thich Nhat Hanh, already a classic by the 1990’s, having first appeared in 1975. Those first audiences would have known him in his original cultural context. Though he had spent time studying and teaching in the United States, at Princeton Theological, Columbia, and Cornell, he returned to Vietnam in 1963, and was a peace activist throughout the war years, though he was forced to flee to France in 1966, as the United States-backed regime equated “peace” with “communism.” 

Some things never change.

Though I would not know it until many years later, Nhat Hanh was connected to two other important members of my Twentieth Century Ordo, visiting the Trappist monk and contemplative teacher Thomas Merton at the Gethsemani Abbey, and meeting with the Rev. Dr. King, who Nhat Hanh urged to condemn the Vietnam War, something King would do the following year at a historic United Church of Christ congregation in Manhattan. Funny how it is all connected.

It was from Nhat Hanh, and especially his 1997 teaching and book “The Heart of Understanding,” that I came to understand inter-being, sometimes labeled “emptiness” in the English language, and from all of his works, going right back to “The Miracle of Mindfulness,” I came to understand the power of the present moment.

This afternoon, I’ll once again chase after Micah 6:8, though again use Nhat Hanh as a touchstone. This morning, it is Nhat Hanh that I turn, or maybe that other great school of philosophy I admire, Pearl Jam, with Eddie Vedder singing “It makes more sense to live in the present tense.”

Nhat Hanh might say something like this: When you wash the dishes, only wash the dishes. When you peel an orange, only peel the orange.

This is mindfulness, and pretty much the opposite of the way we live, completely the opposite of end-stage Neo-liberal capitalism, which must always tell us we are less so that we will buy more.

Continue reading “Two Homily Sunday: Anniversary Service”

“What is it good for?” : 5 October 2025

Lamentations 1:1-6

SERMON

In the Protestant tradition, we tend to think of “the” Reformation as beginning when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses for an academic disputation to the door of All Saints Church in Wittenberg. The 508th anniversary of that supposed event, Reformation Day, will be Halloween. I don’t know how we are supposed to reenact the Diet of Worms, an important part of the Reformation, with children ringing the doorbell every five minutes, though if you do your candy shopping right, you might offer a diet of worms of a different gummy sort.

You can predict what I am about to say next. We are not certain that exact thing happened on that exact day. Luther did mail his document to Albert of Brandenburg, the Archbishop of Mainz, on October 31st. He may have also posted it on church doors, at All Souls and other parishes, sometime in the following days and weeks, as was customary. But this initial act was not quite as dramatic as tradition would have us believe.

Luther’s was not the first attempt to reform the Christian church, nor would it be the last. We trace our particular history as Congregationalists to the Swiss Reformation, and Huldrych Zwingli. That reform began with what was quite literally a sausage party, though one held during Lent, and so violating the fasting requirements of the Roman church. 

Centuries earlier, Peter Abelard advocated for human reason in reading scripture instead of unquestioning belief, and was condemned as a heretic. Italy’s Waldensians refused to baptize infants, and denied transubstantiation, the idea that the bread and wine become actual flesh and blood. The Lollards also rejected transubstantiation, and also, daringly, rejected papal authority. 

I could go on, for there were dozens of reforming movement in the regions controlled by the Roman church, and that doesn’t even take into consideration the four patriarchs who never submitted to the patriarch of Rome in the first place, the original tradition we broadly label as the “Orthodox” church.

But this is not a Reformation sermon. Today, we celebrate two contemporary American saints, Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter, and one traditional saint, Francis of Assisi. I’d like to suggest that Francis, in particular, led his own kind of reform movement, and that he did so from a place of brokenness.

We have the stories, the paintings, the various religious orders, from the original Order of Friars Minor to the countless offshoots, as well as Franciscan movements in other traditions. There are Lutheran Franciscans, Anglican Franciscans, and Ecumenical Franciscans, this last group including lay members like our own Crystal. 

The stories, some true, some maybe not so much, are lovely, and do what great stories are supposed to do, serve as mirrors so that we can see ourselves, and beyond ourselves the world, connect our tragedies and our blessings, our oppression and our transcendence, to the great story. 

It is no surprise that a culture that has lost the ability to read, even to sit through a full length movie, that is drowning in a tsunami of Tik-Tok videos, has lost empathy and relationship. Story has always been about meaning making and connection. 

Francis di Bernardone was the son of a wealthy merchant in an age when what we now call Italy was torn with warring factions and city-states. Scholars would eventually lump the largest groups into two broad categories, though in reality the divisions meant little politically. In 1197, the “popolo” party with which the di Bernardone family was aligned initiated a civil war in Assisi, driving the opposing faction from the city and destroying their towers, for as anyone who has been a tourist in northern Italy knows, towers were a thing. The losing faction fled to Perugia. 

In 1201, Assisi launched an offensive against Perugia. It did not go well. In fact, by some accounts, it was a slaughter. Francis and many of his companions were captured, and though he was wealthy enough to afford a horse, and therefore was kept with the knights to be ransomed, Francis was traumatized by the experience, and his health declined dangerously while in custody.

Francis was released from the Perugian prison after a little over a year. Back home, he experienced what we now call flashbacks. His sleep was torn by violent dreams. He had post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD. 

Continue reading ““What is it good for?” : 5 October 2025”

After: 28 September 2025

Jeremiah 32:1-3a, 6-15

Jeremiah was not, in fact, a bullfrog. That is a generational jokes for us old folks…

He was far more cranky than he was croaky. He was so cranky that his name has become synonymous with a long mournful complaint, known as a jeremiad.

He had a lot to complain about. Modern folks tend to focus on the personal piety stuff, and he did rant and rave about that. We even see evidence in his writing that the practice of child sacrifice had not been completely abolished among the Jewish people, despite the ancient story of Abraham and Isaac. Like other prophets, Jeremiah believed that personal infidelity and collective injustice together would result in divine punishment.

But a significant portion of his prophetic activity was focused on politics and diplomacy as Judah tried to maneuver around the powerful forces to the southwest and northeast. The particulars may seem of limited use to us, as we are not caught between Egypt and Babylon, though frankly we are caught between Israel and Palestine, and should be mindful that the hard line between private values and public policy is a fiction that was no more true in the past than it is in the present. There are no parts of your life that do not utterly depend on God, so there are no parts of your life or our lives collectively that are exempt from the law of love.

In today’s reading, Jeremiah purchases a piece of property. Those who were here last week may remember that the family land, a farming plot known as a small-hold, was economically and culturally important, passed from generation to generation. There were strict rules about the transfer of this land, rules meant to keep it in the family. We are not told why Jeremiah’s cousin Hanamel is selling his plot, though the nation is in crisis and the enemy is at the proverbial gates. Custom says that Jeremiah has the right of first refusal, and he exercises it, purchasing the field at Anathoth, and insuring copies of the deed are safeguarded.

At first glance, this looks like a mundane transaction. Of course, it isn’t. It is recorded in scripture because it is far more than it seems.

First of all, Jeremiah was incarcerated at the time of the purchase. Like Donald Trump, King Zedekiah wanted to silence anyone who dared to point out the obvious failures of his despotic regime and idiotic diplomacy. Just a few chapters after today’s reading, the king allowed a lynch mob of his supporters to throw Jeremiah into a cistern in hopes that he would sink into the mud quickly or starve slowly, murder without bloodshed to avoid Torah prohibitions. It was a minority court official from the Horn of Africa, a Cushite, who appealed to the king and rescued Jeremiah, though the prophet remained in custody.

Second, Jeremiah’s entire message was that the nation would be destroyed. Zedekiah was only on the throne because Babylon had conquered the nation, pillaged Jerusalem and the Temple, and taken Zedekiah’s brother, the rightful king, hostage. Zedekiah, who was on the throne because Babylon allowed it, had a knack for picking the wrong side, so he stopped paying tribute to the Babylonian king, Nebuchadnezzar, and aligned with Egypt. The Babylonians responded by once again laying siege to Jerusalem, and once victorious, destroyed the city and the Temple completely. The remaining elite and craftsmen of the Jewish people were taken to Babylon, where they would remain for half a century.

The basic facts of the story are well supported in the archaeological record. Not only are the destruction and captivity fact, there are ancient tablets, seals, and pottery shards naming key characters in the story dated to that era.

Given this, it seems foolish of Jeremiah to buy land. He will never enjoy it. 

But this is precisely why this story found its way into scripture. Jeremiah had predicted the continuing collapse of the Kingdom of Judah. But he had also predicted restoration. This mundane transaction was a prophetic action, a bit of optimism, an affirmation of hope. It was planning for what came next.

Continue reading “After: 28 September 2025”

Radicalized: 21 September 2025

Luke 16:1-13 

Though the word “radicalize” has been around for two centuries, it came into common usage with the rise of the internet, and especially social media in recent decades. 

We’ve heard so many reports of terrorists radicalized by online calls for jihad that it is almost an expectation at this point. This past week, it has been misapplied to Tyler Robinson, the young man accused of murdering the hatemonger Charlie Kirk. 

Of course, radicalized depends on your definition of radical. Two years ago, we would have described the murder of DeKalb County Police Officer David Rose in an attack on the Centers for Disease Control as the work of a radicalized assailant, Patrick Joseph White. These days, he’s just one extreme on a continuum that includes our Secretary of Health and Human Services, the son of a man assassinated in 1968 by a Palestinian Christian radicalized by U.S. support for Israel. 

Historically, the word “radical” has referred to those members of the social and political left who press most aggressively for equality and the common good. That is to say, a radical is someone who challenges the consolidated wealth and power of the few. Which makes me a radical.

Let’s spend a few moments zooming in on a particular case of “radicalization,” one that might offer us a way to interpret today’s messy reading from the gospel.

The Roman communion experienced about a decade and a half of liberalization, from the start of the Second Vatican Council in 1962 to the election of the man who would take the name John Paul II in 1978. During that brief time, a theological movement developed in Latin America that came to be known as “liberation theology.” 

Some may remember that South and Central America experienced numerous civil wars and coups d’etat during those decades, often with the most oppressive forces supported by the United States, an interfering hemispheric role we have played since James Monroe first articulated his eponymous doctrine in 1823.

The most active thinkers in liberation theology were members of Catholic religious orders, including the Dominican Gustavo Gutiérrez, the Jesuit Jon Sobrino, and the Franciscan Leonardo Boff, who was repeatedly silenced by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, until Boff eventually left the priesthood.

El Salvador was ideal soil for the message of liberation, with one of the highest poverty rates in the region and control of most arable land by only fourteen families. There had been a political resistance movement for decades, and a series of sham elections keeping the oligarchs in power.

In 1977, the Archbishop of San Salvador, Luis Chávez, reached the mandatory retirement of 75. As his replacement, the Vatican chose the boring and scholarly Bishop of Santiago de María, Óscar Romero. He was a safe pick, a social conservative, and suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder. He was neither charismatic nor likely to cause trouble.

Continue reading “Radicalized: 21 September 2025”